Concerns raised over alleged 'sabotage' of TUT Sekhukhune University project
Founder of the Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) Sekhukhune University Establishment Project, has raised serious concerns over the alleged sabotage of the proposed University of Mining and Agriculture in Sekhukhune, Limpopo.
The organisation has expressed outrage over backtracking on their promise to build a TUT campus at the Bapedi Kingdom of Sekhukhune that was meant to have broken ground about four years ago.
Despite a signing of a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) between TUT and the Bapedi Kingdom in May 2021, the process has yet to get underway.
The delay has sparked outrage among the Bapedi nation and the establishment project, who are saying they feel betrayed at the non-communication and the delay, especially after President Cyril Ramaphosa endorsed the project in his visit during the burial of the late King Victoria Thulare III in the same year.
In an open letter released this week to the TUT Vice-Chancellor Professor Tinyiko Maluleke, Maphutha accused Maluleke of deliberately sabotaging the project.
Maphutha claimed that despite a fully-funded feasibility study being completed, there has been inexplicable silence from Maluleke’s office.
He also alleged that Maluleke has covertly worked to divert the project from Sekhukhune to Giyani, his hometown.
“What is most alarming is growing evidence that, despite publicly denying any misconduct, you have covertly worked to divert this project from Sekhukhune to Giyani — your hometown,” Maphutha said.
Maphutha has demanded that Maluleke provide transparency on the project’s progress. He called for a public debate or open dialogue to address the facts and ensure transparency.
“We demand a public debate or open dialogue to address the facts and ensure transparency,” Maphutha said.
Maphutha also expressed concerns over Maluleke’s public misrepresentation of the facts. He claimed that Maluleke has claimed that the MOU is silent on the Sekhukhune project, which is patently false.
“Your public misrepresentation of the facts is equally troubling. You have claimed that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is silent on the Sekhukhune project — a claim that is patently false,” Maphutha said.
Maphutha has made several demands, including a public debate or open dialogue to address the facts and ensure transparency, a comprehensive progress report on the University of Mining and Agriculture in Sekhukhune, a parliamentary inquiry or independent investigation into the possible redirection of this project and an immediate and public retraction of all “misleading” claims made regarding the steering committee and the contents of the MOU.
Maphutha emphasised that the community will not be silenced and will pursue legal action if necessary.
“We will not be silenced. We will not stand idle while a project of national importance is quietly stolen. The truth must come out and those responsible must be held accountable. Legal action will be pursued where necessary,” Maphutha said.
TUT spokesperson Tshisikhawe had yet to answer questions about whether the university was aware of the open letter.
Speaking to the publication, Maphutha confirmed that Maluleke had not answered his letter.
“He has not responded yet and we are not surprised that he has not responded, he has not responded since the day we have been requesting for his attention after we realised that he had moved the project,” Maphutha said.
Maphutha also confirmed that his organisation had reported the matter to the Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka and had sought legal advice from their lawyers on the matter.
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za